Hotel Review posted by EDWARDS, Terry, Australia in December 2005
|
Traveler Rating: 2/5
My ratings for this hotel are:

    Room
    Bathroom
    Room Size
    Facilities
    Cleanliness
    Location
    Service
    Value
I recommend this hotel for:

Budget Travelers
Families
Couples/Romantics
Seniors
Business
Eco Adventure
Would I stay at this location again: Probably not
|
|
The room was of good size, however, it could do with some refurbishment. The carpet was worn out, bathroom needed new tiles and some scrubbing up. My wife had to request a change of the bedcover which still had the remains of the previous occupants! The staff did not really pay much attention to our needs so there is not much I can comment on the service. Location is not bad but there are hotels in the same area/location at the same price with better facilities and exceptional service which the Royal at Queens hotel does not offer.
|
|
|
|
|
This Royal At Queens hotel review is the subjective opinion of an AsiaRooms customer and not of AsiaRooms.com.
|
|
Be the first to rate this review!
|
|
Did you find this review helpful?
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Last Royal At Queens Hotel Reviews - 215 Unbiased Traveler Review (s) |
3/5 Posted by MR. BOREHAM, James, Australia in September 2008
|
| "Good location but very noisy building with hard beds" |
|
5/5 Posted by MR. MALIK, Waseem Gilani, Norway in August 2008
|
| "Good hotell. Newly renovated. But you could hear the other guests in the other rooms. So the rooms are not so good isolated.
But the location is okay." |
|
4/5 Posted by MRS. WATTS, Australia in August 2008
|
| "Location excellent. Reception very helpful and efficient. Pool disappointing with no accessable toilets and only cold showers and small changing area.
Room clean but bathroom small and badly needing an update. Noisy renovations on floor above whilst we were there. Breakfast good but need more variety, we stayed 6 nights and there was little change in availability most mornings." |
|
3/5 Posted by MR. PHAY, Soon Chieh, Malaysia in August 2008
|
| "Location wise very good! but the room a bit too old & renovation in progress(very noisy)!" |
|
3/5 Posted by Gitanjali Prasad, New Zealand in August 2008
|
| "The location is ideal for travellers. The City Hall Train station is a 10 min stroll. Lots of shopping and eatery places around.
Since, the hotel was undergoing renovations, it was noisy. There was a slight smell in the hotel, which I attribute it to the renovation.
Breakfast was good with variety, however, the same variety was served for the three days we stayed there, and was pretty cold.
Overall, hotel is good if you use it only for sleeping, as LOCATION is GREAT. I would stay there again." |
|
|
All Royal At Queens hotel reviews >>
|
|
|
|